i love you, get out! can i have one kiss goodbye, get out, yeah, you understand, if... i'm leaving now, i'm leaving

forever, go away, no need, go away, there's a big game on the air, there are many serious, and often alarming, and sometimes, unfortunately, simply tragic events in the world.

petty and unimaginative american liberals, but they attack him all the time, but this time, what kind of trifles are these, let's listen to what the former, and at the same time future, president said about greenland and panama. in order to ensure national security and freedom throughout the world, the united states of america believes that ownership and control of greenland is an absolute necessity.

i mean, how funny is that, i'm interested in your opinion, well , it's pretty funny, really, but i think it's very trump-esque, i understand that it works, i think the average american likes it, the average american probably likes it, oh, we'll take greenland, we 'll take the fan channel, but the average an american, he thinks in such... simple understandable categories, in this sense trump generally understands the psychology of his people, well listen, he is an experienced man, 78 years old, then we must not forget that he worked in show business, and was, in general, a truly successful businessman, although twice, as far as i remember, he was bankrupt, yes, you know, he would correct you, his individual companies were bankrupt. and each

time as a result of going bankrupt he only got rid of unnecessary obligations and accordingly got rich, it seems to me that he has this and... there is some kind of trump style in this , constantly throwing some ideas into space, sometimes completely crazy, sometimes some not inadequate, which seem inadequate, but this is the style, it seems to me, in this way he, he really, look, no one can really understand what kind of policy he will actually conduct, in principle, he is already the elected president, and... in fact, no one can completely determine exactly, we are guessing, yes, we are all the time there to say, we assume what, how he , how he will behave, in the world, in europe , everyone is guessing, but he does not give any real, as they say, points of view from which one can put together some kind of picture,

is this just a character trait, carelessness, well, no, i don’t think so, he is an experienced person, he is of course such a seasoned, seasoned wolf. let’s assume for a minute that from the united states gaining control over greenland and panama, the united states could really become better, in terms of economic, especially when it comes to the panama canal, in terms of geopolitical american influence, if we talk about greenland, here you are, andrei andreevich,

saying that he thinks so, cheese-making, buffoonery, do the united states have any difficulties in influencing countries of their own interest, especially if these are allied states in europe, do they have any problems in interacting with denmark to the jurisdiction that greenland falls under, absolutely none, denmark is suddenly now acting almost as one of european instigators of the escalation of the crisis, reflecting on some kind of blockade in the baltic sea. and of course, it is difficult, difficult to take these words seriously, i will recall an episode from 2017, it seems that this was trump's first nato summit in europe with his participation, and he received a rather cold reception there,

european leaders somehow whispered, laughed at him, interacted with him with a smile, and this irritated him so much that he suddenly pushed away some figure in a rather ferocious state, it turned out a little bit more than the president of montenegro and it would seem that it would be necessary, it would be necessary to be offended and say something like that, but the president of montenegro spoke in the spirit that - it is not offensive at all, on the contrary, this is the great president of the united states, we are even glad that cherny is participating in this process, that's how it turned out that yes, he really pushed me away, well , we do not hold a grudge, in general, it was difficult to expect any other answer from him in this performance.

it would be quite a correct exchange, i would be in the place of our officials persons, well, not that he supported it, but he said, we wouldn't be against it at all, take denmark, this greenland, karen georgievich, i think you'll agree that in these actions, somewhat provocative, obviously extravagant, there is a departure from the american line of acting in cooperation with allies, as if offering them some.

the americans are now beginning to calculate what the risks are to the physical security of the continental us territory in connection with russia's testing of new types of missile weapons, and what in connection with this it is necessary to do with the european pro, to strengthen the american component, of course, and not the europeans, and this is a completely alien and incomprehensible logic for the europeans, which their american president invites with such patient episodes and... get used to them, koren, you are absolutely right about the reaction of the average american,

at least i have seen such a reaction in the past, and it was under rather interesting circumstances, it was the bush i administration, and there was such a president of panama naryago, yes, yes, who behaved in relation to the united states from the point of view of america, impudently, that is, he did not recognize american leadership in the region. well , besides, he was also, well, let's say, a specific person, well, he traded drugs, after all, a small country, he needed additional income, but which of the presidents of latin american countries did not trade something like that, but they behaved obediently, and president bush, the elder, a completely peace-loving person in principle, was upset when they beat up an american lieutenant in the zone panama canal. and by doing so they showed disrespect, even insulted the united states,

and they sent troops to the region, removed him, then rotted him for a long time in an american prison for drugs, the legally elected president of panama, they took him, put him in prison in america for drugs, took him to america, and my friend commanded a division that kind of played a key role in this operation, and he then returned, received a serious post in washington and he was there there was a place called fort mcneer, where the military is located kolochki, these are other military educational institutions, and where some senior generals live, and he organized a group there, where all these generals ran to shake their growing bellies and it turns out that they are in great american shape, i mean not military, but physical. and he told me: listen, join us, well, i joined, for me

it was very useful and it was also interesting to communicate with these people, so he came back - general assignments in panama, we all ran, and there was a very cool guy running with us under the heat master sargent, strushin, and he really liked to shout at all these generals, but it also kind of inspired them. amused, so he says, to my friend, generals, i am so proud of america now, you know, all these years, well, there was a lot wrong, now i am so proud of america, and i think you're right, i don't want to say for all americans, because america is a diverse and motley country, it's difficult. but there is a very large category of american voters who are so

behavior inspires, especially when they don’t, when they don’t have to take any risks or losses for this, but i want to ask you, vladimir mikhailovich, you are a leading senator, first deputy chairman of the federation council committee on international affairs, and what about russia,

doesn’t it say anything bad, but it says a lot of extravagant things, as for, i agree with karin gegorvich, but it would probably be good for the greenlanders if they joined the united states. its autonomous government, autonomous denmark and the autonomous government has already said, in no case, well, i think that no one will particularly ask them in case of anything, but to fall under the jurisdiction of washington, i think that they would not be against it. as for greenland, i think that the interest there is deeper, most likely in connection with the development of the northern sea route, because we

are creating good positions there, the americans also want in this region, well, a little further, but in the same s...

he thoroughly conveys and reproduces in the context of napoleon, this is exactly how he thought about

the small republics in italy and germany that were being annexed to the empire, so he gave venice to the austrian empire simply because he needed to give it something so that they could measure themselves, each time the statement, in connection with his decisions, was in the spirit of revolutionary expediency and french interests, and not in the name of something else, so here i believe that the future american president also has a sense of historical destiny , a sense that his vision, it overrides any other motives and any other... arguments, well, i just hope that when all his evil nasty advisers tell him that this can't be done, that he might even go to meet them, but in his heart he'll be angry with them , and when they come and tell him how to defend allies in europe, what will he tell them, you stopped me then,

and now don't bother me, and you know, this is a very interesting question for me: mikhailovich, i still lived in america during the period when traditional geopolitics, the geopolitics of nixon, kissinger, in general, dominated, there were other points of view, but it was a completely respectable model of approach to international relations, now i see how they are all fixated on ukraine. ukraine was part of the russian empire for a century, had no history of statehood, traditionally there were some frictions between moscow and kiev, these frictions grew to such a conflict, but why should this

be perceived by the united states as some kind of existential american interest. what is the logic in your opinion of those who look at ukraine and say that the united states is ready to risk almost a world war? i think that the matter is a little different, it seems to me that the main task of our people, now i call them enemies, frankly, was to weaken our country at any cost. ukraine turned out to be very convenient for this at the right time, in the right. together, nationalist sentiments were very strongly developed there, neo-nazism flourished there and they realized that ukrainians could be used specifically in... in a direct confrontation with russia, because, in general, no other country from the same former eastern bloc, i think, could have resisted russia

the way ukraine did, well, these are the same russian people, they are just poisoned by this idea of ​​neo-nazism, so they fight to the last, this is precisely why all western countries support blind ukraine, they don’t need ukraine, they need a confrontation with moscow, to use it. and i agree with president putin, who said that it probably would have been better if it had been done a little earlier, but we are all strong in hindsight, because now we know

what we know, then we did not know it and could not know it, i also assumed that in response there would be some american and western sanctions, more broadly, well, i did not think, i did not expect that because of... this , such a great nuclear power as russia would be declared some kind of holy war , it would be possible to organize a crusade against it campaign, because well in russia they rightly said how much europe had constructive economic relations with russia, look at germany, well, what russia, maybe i didn't notice something, well , what it did. russia after the end of the soviet union, what russia did that somehow threatened german interests, or german self

-esteem, maybe there was something like that, but i didn't notice it, do you have an explanation for why they declared this sacred campaign, sacred in quotes against russia, because of the dispute between the slavs, firstly... we are very happy about the fact that we can welcome you as a professor of our faculty, for us this is a great gain, secondly, what makes this conflict not an average or small eastern european conflict between russia and ukraine, is the fact that in essence ukraine has become a projection or instrument of a large western transatlantic project, and it so happened that ukraine has become an expression of the peak of this project, regardless

from that, then, who exactly the west was absorbing, it could have been nationalist forces, as happened in ukraine, they had a conditional carte blanche. went the way of turning ukraine into a military instrument of the west, from this moment the clash became essentially inevitable, and vladimir vladimirovich in a number of his interviews,

now, and some time before that, he said, we should have acted earlier, prepared better, and this clash became inevitable, now the west, the europeans, watching how, firstly, the western project as a whole is beginning fall apart, president trump is starting to tell them about this, hinting at greenland, hinting at panama, that the us has separate interests from europe, that atlantic unity is falling apart or that noticeable cracks are appearing in this consensus, such cracks that trump is now trying to use in order to strengthen the american position at the expense of the europeans. this has been going on for several years now, individual european political forces are starting to say that we were generally wrong in forming at the heart of our unity is this solidarity with the united states. and trump is very persistent in pointing this out to them. i believe that russia has become one of the very important reasons that this atlantic unity has

become subject to.

the ussr, plus they, as vladimir kallovich said, correctly, they thought that they had seized the right moment, their task is not, this is a chance that they believe they cannot miss, that is why they are so stubborn, they understand that their main rival is really china, because china is an economic rival, and i honestly do not see, i do not see the possibility for the west to resist china, with its huge population, with its organization, with its...

to defeat russia, but to create a condition under which some kind of internal, as they say, situation can begin in russia, so to speak, which will help them change the ruling elite in russia, this is what they are counting on, and it seems to me that this is the main goal, they still, in my opinion, have not been disappointed in this idea, that is why they are so stubborn, by the way, we will see, we talked about...

where he was very successful for many years, decades, he is an unpredictable person, he likes to be unpredictable, it is true, he likes to...

economies, and here is something i see for the first time, although there were some interesting precedents, like what the first president shah george washington warned about, when the passion for permanent unions leads to a situation where unions do less to increase the security of the state that relies on them, and put a straitjacket on it more forces... this state to go for the sake of preserving the union, in what direction, and it is clear, since there is a union, it means that it must be against someone, it means that an enemy is needed, when they decided to preserve and strengthen nato

after the end of the cold war, then they thereby predetermined the need for russia as an enemy, where am i wrong? no, you are right, but i do not... i do not see your contradiction with marx, all the same it seemed to me that there is, at least from my point of view there is, but in any case i did not see it, then explain, because all the same there is an economic behind this interest, all the same , economic interest is at the core, russia, russia occupies a colossal place, in the world it is enough to just look at the globe, russia is engaged today. the key place in general in the connection of the east and west , this has never happened, by the way, because it has always been cold, now there is the northern sea route, russia has colossal resources, in my opinion, for this, this is the internal

internal reason for this conflict, another thing is that it hides behind ideology, ideology hides behind, well, everything is covered up by ideology, but it seems to me that you, as if i do not see a contradiction.

the soviet union, not only russia, all the republics, it was a phenomenal robbery, allowed the west to exist for some time in general quite successfully, this time is over, they need another resource, it seems to me, this is the whole problem, senator, i want support.

unfortunately, for them, the only thing is that it will be destroyed, because each country has its own interests, and you can’t put each of these under the same comb countries to let down, here they, as i think you mean, they are going against both historical tradition and the course of history, in the united states they are preparing for a change of power. and all sorts of interesting

conversations are taking place about what kind of foreign policy the united states should pursue, new people are being appointed, well, some better understanding is emerging about the direction in which the administration is ready to go, and let's see what president trump's special representative on this issue says about ukraine.

a ceasefire along the current line of battle contacts and subsequent negotiations would preserve a sovereign, democratic, western-aligned , and self-defensive ukraine. kiev would retain an internationally recognized claim to sovereignty over the entire territory of the country. a cessation of hostilities would also help provide credible security guarantees that would deter russia from resuming the conflict, although such an outcome would be less satisfactory than a complete military victory that increasingly seems out of reach, it would represent a strategic defeat of russia and strengthening both us national security and the western alliance. to be fair, this article was published a year ago, but kellock was already part of trump's unofficial team at that time, with the only difference being that he could afford to express himself more freely.

then other eu countries are obliged to assist him by all

means available to them. this formulation is perhaps even more binding than article 5 of the nato charter. russia has already agreed not to interfere ukraine's accession to the eu during the 2022 negotiations . but you see, this article is already the last one, and the foreign affairs, national interest magazine, as if it were always there, if i may say so. such articles kellock expresses

what we just heard, andrey andreyevich, do we have any grounds for optimism, or does this generally not go far enough for it to have practical significance for russia? dmitry, i would like to draw attention to two circumstances: firstly, ukraine itself is prohibiting itself from holding negotiations now with us and itself rejected the regulation formula that was developed jointly by the russian-ukrainian delegations during the negotiations in istanbul. secondly, we see that the expectations, the assessments of american experts regarding the prospects for a settlement are constantly declining, a year ago, 2 years ago, the same people. said things that were significantly more ambitious and offensive for the interests of the united states, everyone saw a high probability of a ukrainian victory, the american generals, the expert community, the people who spoke about the need world, were in the minority, the negotiation process itself, which

took place in istanbul, as you know, was obstructed by a number of western elites, british politicians influenced and took part in... with action on kiev, so that it would refuse the settlement, since the intention was the opposite, to weaken russia. now the us has the feeling that if the situation continues to develop in this way, a situation will arise close to, de facto, the defeat of ukraine, de facto the defeat of the west, since the west itself associated with the military effort of ukraine, at a time when the west had the illusion that ukraine had a chance to win, everyone was bragging about what it meant, this is our victory too.

the greater middle east, this process ran into an iceberg of circumstances, the life circumstances of the middle east, the imperfection of the social structure, the lack of resources that the united states was willing to allocate to this company, and the first us commander who was willing to admit that american goals had to be sharply reduced was commander david petraeus, who in congress in 2006, i think, for the first time stated loudly, quite publicly, that...

is consistent with the russian vision, which was laid out in a systemic manner by the russian president at a meeting with ambassadors and permanent representatives at the ministry of foreign affairs this summer, and here i think that there should be no false expectations among colleagues in the united states that the version that they are now laying out, if they offer it to us, it will be met here with with enthusiasm and unconditional acceptance, far from it, the russian vision.

compromise, by the way, our president said on the direct line that we are ready, he is ready for a compromise, that's right, if you enter into negotiations, you can understand what it is, but the fact itself is that they are already talking about the fact that this is the european union, and we really did not object to ukraine joining the european union, and

did not say a word about other military guarantees for ukraine, but this is already a certain kind of reduction of that plan. russia, it is not even that at some stage in many years ukraine can join nato, but that from the moment ukraine was invited to nat. combined worries in relation to the european union,

with pumping ukraine with weapons, that i am that the european union is increasingly acquiring geopolitical functions, and that the european union plays a direct role in providing weapons. experts, when they talk about the formula for peace, truce, they say: "

we will not take ukraine into nato" now, as if someone suggested taking it in nato, not long ago, or even 2 years ago, this was not the case, they say, well, the territories that russia controls will remain for russia, excuse me, but can they take these territories from russia? that the course of military actions in ukraine gives them such hope, so it seems to me that we must understand that it is easiest to give up what you do not have and cannot acquire, and i want to pay increased attention to those things that really depend on the collective west, here is the readiness refuse.

there are no military forces there yet, so i think that if the question of ukraine's admission to the european union arises, there will be many opponents, this decision will be blocked, because ukraine is now far from being a tasty morsel for the european union, they will not want to carry the rise of ukraine's restoration on their shoulders, slovakia and hungary will most likely be simple, definitely, and not only, i think, well, the same turkey will be outraged, yes, it is not a member of the european union, it has been standing in the anteroom of the european union for more than a decade, i think, this option it won't work. with this soothing thought we go to advertising, we'll be back

in just a few minutes, the banking sector will probably have record profits, we can easily do without the dollar with the help of digital currencies, we have a digital ruble, china has a digital yuan, this year's it expenses are 180 billion rubles for just one bank, we are technologically ahead of the rest of the world. competition in retail business is how creative bankers can be. a bank is a bank first and foremost, banks are yours friends, we are the largest sponsor of all st. petersburg museums and theaters. do you have a favorite region in russia for recreation? of course. kamchatka is like crimea, by the way, these are unique places, you combine business with pleasure. great russian culture, where can you go? podcast. today on the first. soldiers of the 70th guards motorized rifle regiment of the armed forces of russia allegedly

refuse to carry out combat missions. the regiment command sends us to assault with four magazines and one grenade. the video is looped. and this is visible on shaking of the camera. this is a guards motorized rifle regiment, and this is a high rank, it is won with blood. well, this caused certain emotions. we all laughed, smiled. ukrainian propagandists blame russia. days before the moment when the inauguration

of the new president is to take place in georgia, and accordingly, when the current president...

i have practically no doubt about it, excuse me, but why don't you doubt it? and because look at the pressure that was put on georgia from all sides, and from paris, from other european countries, from brussels, but they nevertheless pursue their line, because what they have shown is that this is a strong regime, and a national georgian one, not pro-russian, in no case, but they do not want to live by those, the authorities will even turn to the ordinary georgian people, they will also go out into the streets and sweep away these troublemakers

who, for money, continue to destabilize the situation in the country.

this part of the elite, which unites the georgian dream for itself, cannot be determined in some way and that, then it may still lose, they may be put under pressure, and the matter is a drama, the drama of georgia and the pro-western georgian elite is that in fact georgia has no other option but to be pro-russian to one degree or another, well, it doesn't exist geographically, it just doesn't exist, historically , it doesn't exist historically, somehow you don't want to and so...

georgia is a unique country, it has conducted all possible experiments on itself over the last 30 years, we must remember that the current madam president, whose powers are ending, she is, in general,

a protégé of the most influential person in the country, who does not hold any official position in the power hierarchy, mr. ivanishvili, this import of elites, import of the diaspora, import of western influence through numerous ngos in the country. existed with the support, connivance of the current authorities of the georgian dream, this was their dream, to be part of the west, a whole, a whole layer of the national economy arose, these are the ones they dragged in because of rubishvili, non-profit organizations, in which tens of thousands of people are employed, the grants they receive make up some share of the georgian budget, it is clear that due to the small size of the georgian economy, all this has become possible, and now it is expressed in...

this is the process of improving georgian statehood, frankly speaking, it is not entirely clear what consequences this will have for russian-georgian relations, here i would not rush to make any definite conclusions, the georgian authorities do not remove the argument that we will continue our course is to the west, and in six months, we can reverse this whole thing, i would like, in conclusion, to make an observation that this struggle of the pro-western lobby in georgia with... a nationally oriented government, is quite reproduced in a number of european episodes, remember, in austria sebastian kurz, the prime minister of the government

, whose coalition fell apart due to a scandal, essentially provocative actions, allegedly with a russian trace, was forced to resign in this way, and now and now it is already known, that what seemed to be attributed was a complete provocation, a provocation of lies, of course, and the same kind of pressure in slovakia is exerted on the leaders, in hungary. i admit that any subsequent political force, nationally oriented in europe, it will find itself under the same pressure of pressure, nurtured by a very large-scale, this third sector, ngos, journalists, people sitting on western funding, who, under the pretext of the values ​​of this freedom agenda, they will begin to twist the arms of their own government and encourage him to do things that are not at all unnecessary for him. georgia, i think, has come to terms with the reality of its own geography, russia is its key trading partner, the largest number of russians, the largest amount of financial inflow

from migrants comes from russia.